| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
squeeezer Member

Joined: 02 Mar 2007 Posts: 2390 Location: new richmond WI 190516.56 points
1991 Chevrolet Camaro
|
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:09 pm Post subject: vibration |
|
|
ok so i just fixed the camaro vibration @70mph with the stock d.s.
bought an e-bay speacial aluminum 4th gen shaft=junk vibrated so bad @ 80 cant even drive it and had to replace the new pinion seal (screwed again on e-bay purchase=im done)
balanced the stocker vibration is gone car fixed
so on to the trans am
replaced flimsy torque arm with an umi adjustable unit that attaches to a trans crossmember to lower my 60'
now i have a vibration usually at 3500 rpm or so in all gears depending if the converter is coupling
so i thought uh oh here comes trouble
then i remembered i replaced my trans mount last year after tearing my stock rubber unit (energy susp. polly mount)
so i swapped my trans mounts in both cars
the camaro=stock rubber
t/a =polly
vibration gone.....now ill just rip another rubber trans mount...lol
at least i know what the problem is i can deal with the vibration if i replace it with another polly
and i did not get a vibration in the camaro with the polly cause it has the stock mounted torque arm
just thought id share in case anyone else comes across this or a similar problem
ive been hunting vibrations down lately at home and at work
this one problem came almost 2nd nature im glad cause i know sometimed people spend lots of money chasing these things down and im not immune  _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Knarley Darley Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2004 Posts: 1149
536969.38 points
|
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I built a 94 bird with a LT-4 based 383 and a vortex T- trim super charger back in the day, and it had a global west torque arm with a Strange engineering bolt in 12 bolt rear end. We like you chased vibrations, and one of the things we did was use the stock trans mount and I just made a limiter so it wouldnt tear it apart. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
240Z8 Member

Joined: 22 Jan 2006 Posts: 271 Location: Colorado 43.23 points
1972 Datsun 240Z
|
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 2:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
All my projects since 1986 to current have been non stock engine and trans swaps. One of the biggest frustrations was driveline shakes. The thing I always check now for perfection is phasing of the driveline, vehicle loaded with appropriate weight, sitting at running height and really firm mounts. A good angle gauge, lots of measurements can take a lot of the guess work away.. A worn, soft, or slightly different mount at the transmission or rear end can throw the whole works off. So can having the rear pitch up under hard torque.
On my Z I have all poly mounts, bumper to bumper. When Installed the new rear system with redundant top and bottom mounts, I had to drop my transmission about .25". I have super short driveline, shorter than my forearm, so angles are probably more critical.
That 1/4" made the difference of shaking the mirrors and hitting 150+ smooth as silk. _________________ Too much is never enough! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Supershafts Newbie
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8 Location: Long Island, N.Y. 351.98 points
|
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 240Z8 wrote: | I have super short driveline, shorter than my forearm, so angles are probably more critical.
That 1/4" made the difference of shaking the mirrors and hitting 150+ smooth as silk. |
As speed increases in the driveline you need to make the angles decrease, that .25 of a inch also saved you some hp loss. _________________ Long Island Motorsports Association
www.limotorsports.org L.I.M.A.
Join our Fight for a new motorsports facility
www.Supershafts.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
af2 Member

Joined: 01 Sep 2003 Posts: 5258 Location: grassvalley, ca 62454.74 points
1933 Willys Coupe
|
Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Supershafts wrote: | | 240Z8 wrote: | I have super short driveline, shorter than my forearm, so angles are probably more critical.
That 1/4" made the difference of shaking the mirrors and hitting 150+ smooth as silk. |
As speed increases in the driveline you need to make the angles decrease, that .25 of a inch also saved you some hp loss. |
What happened to the -4 degrees?? on set up??
Welcome to Smokem!!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Supershafts Newbie
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8 Location: Long Island, N.Y. 351.98 points
|
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2009 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| af2 wrote: | | Supershafts wrote: | | 240Z8 wrote: | I have super short driveline, shorter than my forearm, so angles are probably more critical.
That 1/4" made the difference of shaking the mirrors and hitting 150+ smooth as silk. |
As speed increases in the driveline you need to make the angles decrease, that .25 of a inch also saved you some hp loss. |
What happened to the -4 degrees?? on set up??
Welcome to Smokem!!  |
He is running up to 150 mph... the more you increase the speed on your drivline, the less angle You Must run...
On a street only car you need angle to keep the joints from brinelling themselves by not oscillating and circulating..
On a high performance street car you make trade offs and grease your joints much more often...
Here is a rule of thumb to keep in mind for shaft rpms and angles...
At 3000 rpm you shouldn't exceed 5.5 degrees of angle
At 6000 rpm you shouldn't exceed 2.5 degrees of angle
So if you have a street car that does this regularly and is beyond that...you're exceeding limits and using more power to turn it.
On a true performance build you want 0 degrees... getting 0 isn't easy, but trying to get it close is better.
Optimally you want your pinion to be at zero to the shaft under load, that is the optimal setting for power loss...
Now achieving 0 means you need to know how much your pinion changes, Say it changes 2.8 degrees....then you want - 2.8 degrees . _________________ Long Island Motorsports Association
www.limotorsports.org L.I.M.A.
Join our Fight for a new motorsports facility
www.Supershafts.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
10sec.et Member

Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 3100 Location: Houston,Texas 334625.24 points
1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass
|
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2009 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Supershafts wrote: | | af2 wrote: | | Supershafts wrote: | | 240Z8 wrote: | I have super short driveline, shorter than my forearm, so angles are probably more critical.
That 1/4" made the difference of shaking the mirrors and hitting 150+ smooth as silk. |
As speed increases in the driveline you need to make the angles decrease, that .25 of a inch also saved you some hp loss. |
What happened to the -4 degrees?? on set up??
Welcome to Smokem!!  |
He is running up to 150 mph... the more you increase the speed on your drivline, the less angle You Must run...
On a street only car you need angle to keep the joints from brinelling themselves by not oscillating and circulating..
On a high performance street car you make trade offs and grease your joints much more often...
Here is a rule of thumb to keep in mind for shaft rpms and angles...
At 3000 rpm you shouldn't exceed 5.5 degrees of angle
At 6000 rpm you shouldn't exceed 2.5 degrees of angle
So if you have a street car that does this regularly and is beyond that...you're exceeding limits and using more power to turn it.
On a true performance build you want 0 degrees... getting 0 isn't easy, but trying to get it close is better.
Optimally you want your pinion to be at zero to the shaft under load, that is the optimal setting for power loss...
Now achieving 0 means you need to know how much your pinion changes, Say it changes 2.8 degrees....then you want - 2.8 degrees . |
welcome to SMOKEmUP  _________________
| af2 wrote: | It seems we can look at our magical Balls and come up with a fix?
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
af2 Member

Joined: 01 Sep 2003 Posts: 5258 Location: grassvalley, ca 62454.74 points
1933 Willys Coupe
|
Posted: Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Supershafts wrote: | | af2 wrote: | | Supershafts wrote: | | 240Z8 wrote: | I have super short driveline, shorter than my forearm, so angles are probably more critical.
That 1/4" made the difference of shaking the mirrors and hitting 150+ smooth as silk. |
As speed increases in the driveline you need to make the angles decrease, that .25 of a inch also saved you some hp loss. |
What happened to the -4 degrees?? on set up??
Welcome to Smokem!!  |
He is running up to 150 mph... the more you increase the speed on your drivline, the less angle You Must run...
On a street only car you need angle to keep the joints from brinelling themselves by not oscillating and circulating..
On a high performance street car you make trade offs and grease your joints much more often...
Here is a rule of thumb to keep in mind for shaft rpms and angles...
At 3000 rpm you shouldn't exceed 5.5 degrees of angle
At 6000 rpm you shouldn't exceed 2.5 degrees of angle
So if you have a street car that does this regularly and is beyond that...you're exceeding limits and using more power to turn it.
On a true performance build you want 0 degrees... getting 0 isn't easy, but trying to get it close is better.
Optimally you want your pinion to be at zero to the shaft under load, that is the optimal setting for power loss...
Now achieving 0 means you need to know how much your pinion changes, Say it changes 2.8 degrees....then you want - 2.8 degrees . |
What is funny?????
I preach the same thing on deaf ears...
People still run the same -4* no matter what.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Supershafts Newbie
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8 Location: Long Island, N.Y. 351.98 points
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| af2 wrote: |
What is funny?????
I preach the same thing on deaf ears...
People still run the same -4* no matter what.  |
Lol you know the saying.....
"you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make em drink"
I tell them too...and very few listen...in my line of business people don't understand there is hp being sucked up thru the driveline...there are things you can do to make it suck up less...
Everyone is worried about making big hp, not losing 40% thru the driveline...
_______________________________________________
Thankyou 10sec.et _________________ Long Island Motorsports Association
www.limotorsports.org L.I.M.A.
Join our Fight for a new motorsports facility
www.Supershafts.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
squeeezer Member

Joined: 02 Mar 2007 Posts: 2390 Location: new richmond WI 190516.56 points
1991 Chevrolet Camaro
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
so how do you 2 know that you are at a true 0 deg. under load????? _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Supershafts Newbie
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8 Location: Long Island, N.Y. 351.98 points
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You have to find out what your pin moves, every susp is different.
Some link type can move as little as .75 or as much as 2, leaf can move as little as 3 to as much as 4 or 5....
Once you know what your pin changes under load you can adjust for it to be at 0. _________________ Long Island Motorsports Association
www.limotorsports.org L.I.M.A.
Join our Fight for a new motorsports facility
www.Supershafts.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
squeeezer Member

Joined: 02 Mar 2007 Posts: 2390 Location: new richmond WI 190516.56 points
1991 Chevrolet Camaro
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="Supershafts"]You have to find out what your pin moves,
huh???? _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
af2 Member

Joined: 01 Sep 2003 Posts: 5258 Location: grassvalley, ca 62454.74 points
1933 Willys Coupe
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pinion"
You can get a good idea using a bottle jack and angle finder. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
10sec.et Member

Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 3100 Location: Houston,Texas 334625.24 points
1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass
|
Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
one of you guys explain this in laymans terms for those of us that are a little slow . exactly how would one determine the precise pinion angle while under load ? not being a smarta$$, i simply dont know. _________________
| af2 wrote: | It seems we can look at our magical Balls and come up with a fix?
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
squeeezer Member

Joined: 02 Mar 2007 Posts: 2390 Location: new richmond WI 190516.56 points
1991 Chevrolet Camaro
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
yeah......iset mine @-2deg
for a torque arm suspension cause it was what was recomended
so how do i know if im runnin 0 under load
i dont have a vibration problem im just asking _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|