Home | Register | Login | Contact Us

 
Auto Math
Classifieds
Forum
Gallery
Games
Garage
Tech Articles
Utilites
 
FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    RegisterRegister    Log inLog in    Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages    Forum Subscriptions1/4 Mile Table 

um....yeah.....you guys think TRUE 500 hp sbc are rare??????
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SMOKEmUP.com Forum Index -> Other - Engine Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
squeeezer
Member


Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 1966
Location: new richmond WI
178662.08 points


1991 Chevrolet Camaro

PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:25 pm    Post subject: um....yeah.....you guys think TRUE 500 hp sbc are rare?????? Reply with quote

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/Quite-a-Party_698233.htm
_________________
not fella,not squisher......its Jon......or the Brain if you wish
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lun40119
Member


Joined: 22 Oct 2008
Posts: 597
Location: Wisconsin
3900.66 points


1967 Chevrolet Chevelle

PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 8:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Driver said it best...........ALOT OF BOOST!!!!!! I posted a vid of a buddy Shaun's white stock appearing talon street car, at 31lbs boost, making 600hp at the ground. The biggest trick is getting it down the track under power. If you could see the transmissions and clutches in these things, you would understand why they have problems. I have a couple buddies as well as myself that are into drag racing, and none of us can touch the wimpy little 2.0litres 1/8 mile, mph. I am hoping with 5.13 gear I can approach it..............

YES......true 500hp sbc's are rare.....especially on the street. It would be easier if these so called 500HP street engines could turn 8000 or 8500. Most of which can't even make 6000 without skidding on there nose.

_________________
Jake
http://www.cardomain.com/id/excedrin

Make sure your picture isn't too big Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lun40119
Member


Joined: 22 Oct 2008
Posts: 597
Location: Wisconsin
3900.66 points


1967 Chevrolet Chevelle

PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 9:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wait, wait wait..........EVERYONE on the inet has a 500+Hp engine, that makes 400+hp at the ground.........but in the real world falls considerably short. Thats why you see more 500+horse 350's at car shows, than at the drag strip.
_________________
Jake
http://www.cardomain.com/id/excedrin

Make sure your picture isn't too big Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
10sec.et
Member


Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 2506
Location: Houston,Texas
315415.00 points


1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass

PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 10:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah, those cars are pretty neat especially when you consider how much power they are getting out of such a small engine. however, i bet if you put the price tag of say, a "true 500 hp" Camaro up against those 500 hp imports you would be able to get a lot more bang for your buck out of the Camaro Wink .
_________________
" we got no fear, no doubt, all in balls out "
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MufflerBearings69
Member


Joined: 22 Jul 2007
Posts: 642

21742.24 points


1968 Ford Galaxy

PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 11:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We talkin AWD talon?

When the driveline stays together, they are a hell of a good time!

If I were to build an import to any extreme I would want an AWD model for sure...

PS my 302 makes at least 475 on the car show hp scale... and 470 at the tires too with my super lossless driveline lubricated with Zmax! Rolling Eyes

_________________
Just here asking a zillion questions to get the education I paid to get in tech school....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
squeeezer
Member


Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 1966
Location: new richmond WI
178662.08 points


1991 Chevrolet Camaro

PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 1:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MufflerBearings69 wrote:
W
PS my 302 makes at least 475 on the car show hp scale... and 470 at the tires too with my super lossless driveline lubricated with Zmax! Rolling Eyes







that sounds like some of the lsx owners out here Embarassed

some of these guys claim 450 horse at the rear wheels
and i beat them at the track with my 452 horse (at the crank)motor

_________________
not fella,not squisher......its Jon......or the Brain if you wish
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
af2
Member


Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Posts: 4651
Location: grassvalley, ca
12720.16 points


1933 Willys Coupe

PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 6:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

squeeezer wrote:
MufflerBearings69 wrote:
W
PS my 302 makes at least 475 on the car show hp scale... and 470 at the tires too with my super lossless driveline lubricated with Zmax! Rolling Eyes







that sounds like some of the lsx owners out here Embarassed

some of these guys claim 450 horse at the rear wheels
and i beat them at the track with my 452 horse (at the crank)motor



You didn't know eveyone in California has 500 hp and runs 9.80's Laughing Laughing

F k if I can get mine to 9.999999 without something going wrong!!!!! Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Laughing Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Big Dave
Moderator


Joined: 04 Dec 2005
Posts: 2136
Location: Tampa Florida
100541.88 points



PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 7:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually a lot of the LS-x cars are pumping out an honest 500+ crank horse power (it isn't even all that expensive compared to other small block builds if you start out with a fully functional LS-x motor to start with).

The problem is horsepower is only good at Talladega or Daytona on the high bank track. Horsepower is what pushes the air out of the way, and overcomes the forces of friction. Torque on the other hand is what moves a drag car down the track under constant acceleration. I would rather have no more than 100 horsepower written in 24 inch tall scarlet letters on my hood; if you could only deliver to me a broad torque curve that averaged a thousand foot ponds of torque. You talk about an embarrassing time try kicking sand in the grill of some of the diesel rigs around my neck of the woods with six inch exhaust pipes a 120 gallon propane tank in the bed and a an annoying whistle that just seems to follow the truck every where it goes. Ever see 33 inch tall tires go up in smoke at a stop light (all four corners burning at once) Probably not because of all the black soot it pumps out, but they will boogie. Imagine you just got spanked by an inline six. with 445 cubic inches.

Big Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lun40119
Member


Joined: 22 Oct 2008
Posts: 597
Location: Wisconsin
3900.66 points


1967 Chevrolet Chevelle

PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dave, I agree to an extent, but have to respectfully disagree. Tq moves the car initially, but Hp builds the mph and et out past 60-100ft. Here is my theory.......take my engine for instance. I make peak tq at 5100, 5400, and again at 5500. But I make peak Hp at 7400. Now that being said....I don't want to set the car up to trap 5500rpm. It wouldn't get out of its own way. The mph would be crap, which is evident because I am only putting up 118-119 mph, right now trapping 6200. I need to be up around 7600 to be putting down the mph, that the car is capable of. That being said, the reason our little 4 banger buddies can keep up isn't because of tq, although cars like my buddies put down better tq than most 3.5inch stroke guys I know,(by a long shot). It is because of the hp and pull that they make out past 330. Lastly, figure this, if diesel tq is so great, why don't prostockers build low rpm tq monsters. 500" at 10500 rpm is alot more air than 500" at 5000rpm.

Again..........respectfully disagreeing.

_________________
Jake
http://www.cardomain.com/id/excedrin

Make sure your picture isn't too big Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
af2
Member


Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Posts: 4651
Location: grassvalley, ca
12720.16 points


1933 Willys Coupe

PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh shyt the Hp vs Torque!!!!!!! Laughing Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lun40119
Member


Joined: 22 Oct 2008
Posts: 597
Location: Wisconsin
3900.66 points


1967 Chevrolet Chevelle

PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey short stroke how've you been. I know which way you swing!!!!! By the way here is a vid of shawns talon. First run was 11.7 at 120something, and the second run he was low 7's at 104 at the 1/8 but, never saw 4th, the clutch disintegrated. He kept trying to force it into 4th and end up in 2nd at 105ish. I think he said it hit 10000ish. The aftermath was all the flywheel bolts were loose, and the clutch is junk. It is sitting in the shop right now next to my junk.


_________________
Jake
http://www.cardomain.com/id/excedrin

Make sure your picture isn't too big Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
10sec.et
Member


Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 2506
Location: Houston,Texas
315415.00 points


1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass

PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 9:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i dunno. i have to go with Dave on the whole torque thing. ive noticed that the guys with high reving small engines seem to spend more time fixing sh!t than driving the car. although, the torque monsters will definitely shred some drivetrain parts.
_________________
" we got no fear, no doubt, all in balls out "
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
af2
Member


Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Posts: 4651
Location: grassvalley, ca
12720.16 points


1933 Willys Coupe

PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 10:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

10sec.et wrote:
i dunno. i have to go with Dave on the whole torque thing. ive noticed that the guys with high reving small engines seem to spend more time fixing sh!t than driving the car. although, the torque monsters will definitely shred some drivetrain parts.



Biatch! Laughing Laughing
Friggen 455 olds!!!
When it gets cooler the Willys is back.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
af2
Member


Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Posts: 4651
Location: grassvalley, ca
12720.16 points


1933 Willys Coupe

PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 10:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

lun40119 wrote:
Dave, I agree to an extent, but have to respectfully disagree. Tq moves the car initially, but Hp builds the mph and et out past 60-100ft. Here is my theory.......take my engine for instance. I make peak tq at 5100, 5400, and again at 5500. But I make peak Hp at 7400. Now that being said....I don't want to set the car up to trap 5500rpm. It wouldn't get out of its own way. The mph would be crap, which is evident because I am only putting up 118-119 mph, right now trapping 6200. I need to be up around 7600 to be putting down the mph, that the car is capable of. That being said, the reason our little 4 banger buddies can keep up isn't because of tq, although cars like my buddies put down better tq than most 3.5inch stroke guys I know,(by a long shot). It is because of the hp and pull that they make out past 330. Lastly, figure this, if diesel tq is so great, why don't prostockers build low rpm tq monsters. 500" at 10500 rpm is alot more air than 500" at 5000rpm.

Again..........respectfully disagreeing.



Jake, Can I borrow that thing for a week?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lun40119
Member


Joined: 22 Oct 2008
Posts: 597
Location: Wisconsin
3900.66 points


1967 Chevrolet Chevelle

PostPosted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 7:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

10sec.et wrote:
i dunno. i have to go with Dave on the whole torque thing. ive noticed that the guys with high reving small engines seem to spend more time fixing sh!t than driving the car. although, the torque monsters will definitely shred some drivetrain parts.


They are fixing driveline parts Very Happy. But if you build these engines with good parts, and with common sense, they will last along time. I know I reference mine alot, but I turn it pretty hard, it cruises on the highway north of 4500. On the Power tour I could drive for about an hour between fuelings, and it would spend most of the time at or above 4500 for an hour.

_________________
Jake
http://www.cardomain.com/id/excedrin

Make sure your picture isn't too big Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SMOKEmUP.com Forum Index -> Other - Engine Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
Home | Contact Us | Automath | Cam Files | Dyno Search | Forum | Garage | Picture Gallery | Reaction Timer

Copyright © 1997-2005 SMOKEmUP.com All rights reserved.
Advertising Info     Disclaimer     Privacy Policy



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group