Home | Register | Login | Contact Us

 
Auto Math
Classifieds
Forum
Gallery
Games
Garage
Tech Articles
Utilites
 
FAQFAQ    SearchSearch    RegisterRegister    Log inLog in    Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages    Forum Subscriptions1/4 Mile Table 

dynoed my mom and pops motor today
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SMOKEmUP.com Forum Index -> Chevy - Small Block Gen 1
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
squeeezer
Member


Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 2427
Location: new richmond WI
191524.76 points


1991 Chevrolet Camaro

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 2:57 pm    Post subject: dynoed my mom and pops motor today Reply with quote

i posted long time ago about this one

355 cast crank pink rods (arp fasteners) old 4 eyebrow TRW pistons
pocket ported gmpp fast burn heads
comp cam hydraulic roller xr288hr-10
int=236@.050 and .520 lift
exh=242@.050 and .540 lift
9.77 to 1 comp
professional products hurricane manifold
750dbl pump with proform body

this is the motor im putting a 125 shot of no2 on

i only ran (no no2)naturally

results were 452.2 hp @6100 and 427.0 tq @4800
idles @1000 rpm and 10hg

it will be in a 84 trans am

ill be shooting for mid 11's (with the no2)

does this sound about right???????
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
af2
Member


Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Posts: 5558
Location: grassvalley, ca
71227.76 points


1933 Willys Coupe

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 4:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sounds good to me! It should be mid 12's or so without nos.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GrandSportC3
Moderator


Joined: 11 Jul 2003
Posts: 1231
Location: Lakeland, FL
32443.62 points


1968 Chevrolet Corvette

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 8:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I ran 11.67 @ 119.79 mph in my '68 Vette with a 465 HP 383 and a Tremec 5-speed tranny.. (no nitrous - just engine)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
William Jones
Member


Joined: 30 Jan 2006
Posts: 823
Location: Lake city, FL
28541.86 points


1971 Ford Mustang

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 10:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would say real low 12's if the car is full weight. If you have it down to around 3200lbs should run in the 11's as long as you can hook it up and get a good 60ft. Should be a fun car to drive either way. Later Bam
_________________
Take the horse out off the barn and let her RUN BABY RUN!!!!!

92 LX 454ci Clevor 9.24@142.53 N/A
71 Mach1 454ci Clevor 10.16@134 N/A 3850lbs race weight "Lost in fire"
03 Cobra Bone stock 12.42
68 Falcon 363ci 10.55@126 N/A
95 GT 363ci 11.08@118 N/A
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GrandSportC3
Moderator


Joined: 11 Jul 2003
Posts: 1231
Location: Lakeland, FL
32443.62 points


1968 Chevrolet Corvette

PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

William Jones wrote:
I would say real low 12's if the car is full weight. If you have it down to around 3200lbs should run in the 11's as long as you can hook it up and get a good 60ft. Should be a fun car to drive either way. Later Bam


I agree! It depends a lot on the weight of the vehicle.. My '68 was about 3150 lbs with driver when I ran 11.67 with 465 crank HP (365 RWHP)
I sold that 383 to a friend and he ran it in his full weight '78 Vette (over 3700 lbs with driver) and he only ran 12.90's with it.. Well, he also ran a automatic with a street converter and his 60' times were in the 2.0 range. Mine were in the high 1.50's to low 1.60's with the 5-speed..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
squeeezer
Member


Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 2427
Location: new richmond WI
191524.76 points


1991 Chevrolet Camaro

PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 8:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

i have to get it weighed
probably 3400 to 3500 lbs
84 ta

i hope to be ok with my 3000 stall
kinda wish it was higher now say 3500 to 4000 stall would be wicked

but its still a thm700r4

and the rear gears are still a highway friendly 3.23 Embarassed not for long well see if 373's will do better(i will have a rear laying aroundwith this gear in it)ill test and see Very Happy

still dont have motor in
cant wait to find time Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
squeeezer
Member


Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 2427
Location: new richmond WI
191524.76 points


1991 Chevrolet Camaro

PostPosted: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

maybe someone has a calculator for this stuff???
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wagon train
Member


Joined: 07 Jun 2007
Posts: 258
Location: Orange City, FL
7307.16 points


1983 Mercury Capri

PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 3:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

squeeezer wrote:
maybe someone has a calculator for this stuff???



Moroso power speed calculator "says 11.00 120"

450 hp,3400 lbs.

_________________
FORD POWER RULES DEATH TO ALL CHEVYS.

"BAKER"
10/5/50-11/7/06

"She doesn't seem to be breathing right,it might be the jets."-The Mechanic
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
af2
Member


Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Posts: 5558
Location: grassvalley, ca
71227.76 points


1933 Willys Coupe

PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 6:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

squeeezer wrote:
maybe someone has a calculator for this stuff???


Smokes calc says 11.42 at 124. remember that is with everything right. Gearing, traction, etc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
squeeezer
Member


Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 2427
Location: new richmond WI
191524.76 points


1991 Chevrolet Camaro

PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2007 7:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

af2 wrote:
squeeezer wrote:
maybe someone has a calculator for this stuff???


Smokes calc says 11.42 at 124. remember that is with everything right. Gearing, traction, etc.




work in progress
this thing has always gotten good traction
previous motor=390-400 horse great torque
on et streets no problem with traction
never gave em a shot of giggle gas though Rolling Eyes

my gaering absolutely suck right now
thats going to change Twisted Evil
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
squeeezer
Member


Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 2427
Location: new richmond WI
191524.76 points


1991 Chevrolet Camaro

PostPosted: Sat May 08, 2010 1:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

William Jones wrote:
I would say real low 12's if the car is full weight. If you have it down to around 3200lbs should run in the 11's as long as you can hook it up and get a good 60ft. Should be a fun car to drive either way. Later Bam








winning guess with old motor
now on monday i dyno this motor with the paul p cam
a small bump in comp.
and a cleanup of the intake and heads

_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Paul P
Member


Joined: 15 Aug 2002
Posts: 2403
Location: Townsend, Mass.
81574.74 points


1971 Chevrolet Chevelle

PostPosted: Sat May 08, 2010 11:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cool! Should put up some decent power numbers.
_________________
2001 Focus 2.0 Zetec
stock cams, bolt-ons and tune
15.63@87 MPH 1/4mi

1971 - Chevelle 408 SBC N/A
6.86@102.5 MPH 1/8mi
10.78@122 MPH 1/4mi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
squeeezer
Member


Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 2427
Location: new richmond WI
191524.76 points


1991 Chevrolet Camaro

PostPosted: Sat May 08, 2010 1:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

what did you dyno this cam in?
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Knarley Darley
Member


Joined: 22 Apr 2004
Posts: 1247

540238.26 points



PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 3:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The converter and 3.23s should be fine with the 700r4 because it has such a low first gear. Best of both worlds sounds like to me. Good power numbers too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
squeeezer
Member


Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 2427
Location: new richmond WI
191524.76 points


1991 Chevrolet Camaro

PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2010 3:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Knarley Darley wrote:
The converter and 3.23s should be fine with the 700r4 because it has such a low first gear. Best of both worlds sounds like to me. Good power numbers too.







sory knarley

this is the old post=with old engine
even the rear gears are different i was just stating bill was close...damn close for the guess back then

i will dyno the motor tomorrow with the paul p cam
after that i will purchace a converter
my early guess on a converter will be between 3500 and 4000.....we will see

_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SMOKEmUP.com Forum Index -> Chevy - Small Block Gen 1 All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
Home | Contact Us | Automath | Cam Files | Dyno Search | Forum | Garage | Picture Gallery | Reaction Timer

Copyright 1997-2016 SMOKEmUP.com All rights reserved.
Advertising Info     Disclaimer     Privacy Policy